“ WE ARE NOT AFRAID TO ENTRUST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WITH UNPLEASANT FACTS. FOREIGN IDEAS. ALIEN PHILOSOPHIES. AND COMPETITIVE VALUES. FOR A NATION THAT IS AFRAID TO LET ITS PEOPLE JUDGE THE TRUTH AND FALSEHOOD IN AN OPEN MARKET IS A NATION THAT IS AFRAID OF ITS PEOPLE.”
-PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY
IF THE JUSTICES DECIDE TO HEAR THE BRUNSON CASE… they are already acknowledging that the legislature was derelict in their duty to the American people and the constitution in not investigating the possibility of interference in the 2022 election.
I would imagine behind the scenes that the military are more than ready to take this country back and get rid of the Biden fake regime.
The scene would seem to be set for a surprise vote to consider the case which will require the military to keep order during the litigation or whatever form the trial would take…
The fact is the case is really already decided because as stated the legislature WAS derelict of its duty. That is already a fact. 100 of the members of Congress (and the Senate) announced there was reason to investigate. The rest of the members ignored the issue and chose to move forward without considering the necessity to investigate. In so doing they turned their backs on their oath to the constitution and the American people.
The only question would be is what is the PUNISHMENT for such negligence…or sedition or treason? What is the Remedy the Justices would seek on behalf of the American people? That is the question.
The remedy sought by the Brunson case is as we all know, they lose their jobs…they get fired. Never to hold office again. Whether further CRIMINAL ramifications might come or be levied… may also be at the discretion of the justices. I don’t know enough about procedures in cases before the Supreme Court to know where their right to extend the punitive (?) damages go…It may be a follow up criminal case has to be filed to find that out.
LETTER WRITING CAMPAIGN INFO AND PDF JUST PRINT SIGN MAIL …Our country needs all our help.
There is a case in the Supreme Court that seemingly miraculously they have agreed to go to conference on January 6, 2023. If they rule in favor of the plaintiffs it would overturn the 2020 election. This would not be due to fraud, but because 377 out of 532 legislators failed to uphold their oath and investigate allegations of fraud brought up by 147 of their fellow legislators on January 6, 2021, which they were bound by the constitution to do.
CASE SUMMARY (Link to full Case Trail https://ralandbrunson.com/)
rev SCOTUS-Brunson vs Adams
2 Comments
If the justices were to vote either not to hear the case or to vote against Brunson, this is in support of a dereliction of Constitutional duty, it is complicit with neglect of Constitutional duty, and certainly qualifies as “bad behavior” which is the Constitution’s language qualifying them for removal. The only defense put up by the defendants is general immunity, which is void in cases of treason or fraud. The duty is connected with both treason and fraud, ergo no immunity for the 388. But providing aid and comfort to these 388, is that not treason also? Therefore do the Justices think they are immune from being complicit and suffering the same fate? IF THEY THINK THIS it would mean their Oath means NOTHING. During a case you can file a request for a declaratory judgment which clarifies a germane point of law. Filing such a request would back the Justices into a corner which would require them to get on one side or the other of the line in the sand.
(Please review my book on post-Disclosure reforms at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HCzGbI8-LJGIhffft5SptEtD0P19D2q6/view comments [email protected].)
The real problem here may be that we have a government that really does not know what they are doing.