PROJECT CAMELOT PORTALPROJECT CAMELOT PORTAL
    Tags
    Archived Blog Articles ArgusoogRadio Audio Interviews Black Projects and Mind Control Christopher Macklin Classic Camelot Dark Outpost DAVID ADAIR David Nino Rodriguez David Sereda Dr. Robert O. Young Dr. Sharnael W. Sehon earth changes natural and man made General Information history and archaeology Jean-Claude Jen Eason John Lear Juan O Savin Laura Eisenhower Letters to Camelot Livestream Mark Richards Max Spiers Michael Jaco Michael Schratt Mike Sparks mind body spirit and mysteries MUST SEE New Interviews (Slideshow) pandemic Patriot Underground Project Camelot Revolution Radio Richard Alan Miller Richard Hoagland ruling elite secret societies and conspiracies Sceptre Radio Network science and technology Sean David Morton space ets and ufos Super Soldiers The Micro Affect Broadcasting Network WhistleBlower Radio William (Bill) Tompkins
    Facebook Telegram
    PROJECT CAMELOT PORTAL PROJECT CAMELOT PORTAL
    • Camelot Media and Channels
      • Store
      • Guest index
      • Classic Camelot
      • Odysee Channel
      • Camelot Bitchute channel
      • Conference Videos from Awake & Aware
      • Whistleblower Radio
      • Legacy Camelot Site from 2006
      • Legacy Camelot Site from 2009
      • TRANSCRIPTS
      • TRANSLATIONS
      • GUEST BLOGS
        • PAUL COLLIN Unwanted Publicity Guy
        • Sean David Morton
        • Paladin
        • Eddie Page
        • Eddie Page Files
        • Richard Alan Miller
        • Melissa Morton
        • William Dean Garner
        • Kameran
    • Events / Tours
      • EGYPT 2023
      • CAMELOT IN EGYPT – REVIEWS FROM OUR FELLOW TRAVELERS
      • CAMELOT TRAVEL DOCUMENTARIES
    • Members
      • Awake & Aware 2022
      • Awake & Aware 2021
      • HELP & RESOURCES
      • SUBSCRIBE NOW!
    • ABOUT US
      • CONTACT
      • ENDORSE
      • PRIVACY
    • ADVERTISE
    • DONATE
    • Join
    • Help
    • Sign in
      • Memberful Subscription User Dashboard
    PROJECT CAMELOT PORTALPROJECT CAMELOT PORTAL
    Home»Camelot»ARTICLES»BRUNSON CASE: FOR FREEDOM FROM TYRANNY
    ARTICLES

    BRUNSON CASE: FOR FREEDOM FROM TYRANNY

    By Kerry CassidyDecember 17, 20223 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    “ WE ARE NOT AFRAID TO ENTRUST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WITH UNPLEASANT FACTS. FOREIGN IDEAS. ALIEN PHILOSOPHIES. AND COMPETITIVE VALUES.  FOR A NATION THAT IS AFRAID TO LET ITS PEOPLE JUDGE THE TRUTH AND FALSEHOOD IN AN OPEN MARKET IS A NATION THAT IS AFRAID OF ITS PEOPLE.”

    -PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY

    IF THE JUSTICES DECIDE TO HEAR THE BRUNSON CASE… they are already acknowledging that the legislature was derelict in their duty to the American people and the constitution in not investigating the possibility of interference in the 2022 election. 

    I would imagine behind the scenes that the military are more than ready to take this country back and get rid of the Biden fake regime.

    The scene would seem to be set for a surprise vote to consider the case which will require the military to keep order during the litigation or whatever form the trial would take…

    The fact is the case is really already decided because as stated the legislature WAS derelict of its duty.  That is already a fact.  100 of the members of Congress (and the Senate) announced there was reason to investigate.  The rest of the members ignored the issue and chose to move forward without considering the necessity to investigate.  In so doing they turned their backs on their oath to the constitution and the American people.

    The only question would be is what is the PUNISHMENT for such negligence…or sedition or treason?  What is the Remedy the Justices would seek on behalf of the American people?  That is the question.

    The remedy sought by the Brunson case is as we all know, they lose their jobs…they get fired.  Never to hold office again.  Whether further CRIMINAL ramifications might come or be levied… may also be at the discretion of the justices.  I don’t know enough about procedures in cases before the Supreme Court to know where their right to extend the punitive (?) damages go…It may be a follow up criminal case has to be filed to find that out.

    LETTER WRITING CAMPAIGN INFO AND PDF JUST PRINT SIGN MAIL …Our country needs all our help.

    There is a case in the Supreme Court that seemingly miraculously they have agreed to go to conference on January 6, 2023. If they rule in favor of the plaintiffs it would overturn the 2020 election. This would not be due to fraud, but because 377 out of 532 legislators failed to uphold their oath and investigate allegations of fraud brought up by 147 of their fellow legislators on January 6, 2021, which they were bound by the constitution to do.

    CASE SUMMARY (Link to full Case Trail https://ralandbrunson.com/)

    rev SCOTUS-Brunson vs Adams
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email WhatsApp
    Previous ArticleSOVEREIGN REDNECK RENEGADE: WE THE PEOPLE & THE WHITE HATS
    Next Article ON AI, QUANTUM, AND IONQ

    Related Posts

    KERRY CASSIDY ON DARK OUTPOST: WHO WE ARE AND WHY WE WILL WIN THIS!

    January 31, 2023

    JOHN KOERNER: AUTHOR: JFK.JR ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION

    January 30, 2023

    TWO INTERVIEWS WITH KERRY : GAIL OF GAIA INTERVIEW AND SHRED THE VEIL DANIEL AND DEREK INTERVIEW

    January 30, 2023

    2 Comments

    1. Thomas Blow on December 26, 2022 1:39 pm

      If the justices were to vote either not to hear the case or to vote against Brunson, this is in support of a dereliction of Constitutional duty, it is complicit with neglect of Constitutional duty, and certainly qualifies as “bad behavior” which is the Constitution’s language qualifying them for removal. The only defense put up by the defendants is general immunity, which is void in cases of treason or fraud. The duty is connected with both treason and fraud, ergo no immunity for the 388. But providing aid and comfort to these 388, is that not treason also? Therefore do the Justices think they are immune from being complicit and suffering the same fate? IF THEY THINK THIS it would mean their Oath means NOTHING. During a case you can file a request for a declaratory judgment which clarifies a germane point of law. Filing such a request would back the Justices into a corner which would require them to get on one side or the other of the line in the sand.
      (Please review my book on post-Disclosure reforms at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HCzGbI8-LJGIhffft5SptEtD0P19D2q6/view comments [email protected].)

      Log in to Reply
    2. Beverly Parkison on December 23, 2022 1:02 pm

      The real problem here may be that we have a government that really does not know what they are doing.

      Log in to Reply

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Donations needed

     

    SUBSCRIBE NOW!!

    NEWSLETTER
    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
    PROJECT CAMELOT IS BANNED ON TWITTER and YOUTUBE
    BANNED AND CENSORED ON YOUTUBE, TWITTER, LINKEDIN AND INSTAGRAM SEE AND JOIN MY TELEGRAM CHANNEL INTEL AND UPDATES DAILY. https://t.me/projectcamelotKerry
    CAMELOT STORE
    Camelot Store
    © 2023 Project Camelot

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.