THIS INTERVIEW WAS BROADCAST LIVE VIA FACEBOOK THEN POSTED TO MY WEBSITE, RUMBLE AND ODYSEE.COM
TODAY’S INTERVIEW WITH LOY BRUNSON RE Supreme Court Case #22-380 Brunson VS. Adams Defendants Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris & including 388 members of the House of Representatives and Senate.
From the lawsuit:
…”On January 6, 2021, the 117th Congress held a proceeding and debate in Washington DC (“Proceeding”). Proceeding was for the purpose of counting votes under the 2020 Presidential election for the President and Vice President of the United States under Amendment XII. During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged. The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason…”
And…
….”Due to the fact that this case represents a national security breach on a unprecedented level like never before seen seriously damaging and violating Brunson and coincidently effects every citizen of the U.S.A. and courts of law.”
And
…”Voting is the greatest power an individual can exercise in a Republic; it is Brunson’s personal voice and the way he can protect his personal constitutional protected rights and the U.S. Constitution. See ^ 71 of the Complaint. When the allegations of a rigged election came forward the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office.”
And
…”It is an uncontestable fact that the Respondents committed fraud and treason breaching our national security (as factually alleged in Brunson’s complaint), thus adhering to an domestic enemy that continues to breach our national security at an alarming rate on a daily basis. This national security breach is having the same end result as an act of war; to place into power whom the Respondents want, which is Biden. Brunson moves this Court, with its powers, to order the trial court of this case to immediately grant to Brunson the damages he seeks in his complaint. This is necessary to immediately secure our national security without any further delay. “
MY NOTE CONSIDERING THIS CASE DEALS WITH A BREACH OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND POSSIBLE TREASON BY THOSE NAMED there must be limits to the defense of “immunity” on behalf of the defendants wherein IMMUNITY DOES NOT INCLUDE ‘breach of national security or treason.” —Kerry Cassidy
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html
Re: Supreme court case 22-380 Brunson VS. Adams. It alleges that the 2020 election was rigged and it lists the defendants, 94 U.S. State Senators and 129 members of the House of representatives, Joesph R. Biden and Kamala Harris as well as former Vice President Mike Pence, in a conspiracy to defraud the United States and Mr. Brunson, by rigging or allowing to be rigged the 2020 election process. It calls for amongst other things the removal of 94 Senators, President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris as well as over 100 members of the House of Representatives for being part of the conspiracy to rig the 2020 elections and overthrow the duly elected leader of the United States.
Questions presented in the brief are:
A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from this Court and lower appeal courts, along with constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether or not the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case. This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States. In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions. These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.
*This document is public use, there is no copyright. Feel free to share.
Links:
https://7discoveries.com/
(Supreme Court Case Number 22-380)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/writ_of_certiorari
https://casetext.com/case/brunson-v-adams
(Brunson VS. Adams On Petition for Writ of Certiorari To the United States Court of Appeals For The Tenth Circuit)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf
Backup videos:
Nino’s roundtable with Loy, Juan O Savin, the Ghost
EXCERPT FROM ARTICLE:
Supreme Court Dockets Case That Would Flip ’20 Election & Bring Treason Charges For 388 Officials
November 26, 2022
A Supreme Court case has surfaced and as of last Friday, has been added to the court’s emergency docket.
-
Docket 22-380: Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al.
-
The case involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with 388 members of the United States Congress.
-
Respondents were properly warned and were requested to make an investigation Into a highly covert swift and powerful enemy, seeking to destroy the constitution in the United States of America.
-
The case alleges that Congress failed in their Constitutional duties by ignoring the protection of critical infrastructure (election systems) during a National Emergency.
-
US courts have consistently held that fraud vitiates everything (US v Throckmorton, 1878).
-
The refusal of the respondents to investigate The Congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and fraud by respondents.
-
The successful manipulation of US elections constitutes an act of war./ END OF EXCERPT.–LINKED HERE
8 Comments
He Should Contact “Judicial Watch” I follow them on YouTube and their organization which is a government watchdog group, have many lawsuits going on. They have many lawyers and I’m sure they’d help them out. They’ve helped represent many individuals against the Biden Regime.
Salute to the Bronson brothers! The eagerness of the Supreme Court to hear this case is an indication that one way or another the ball will be moved. Personally, I believe the case has powerful merit. DGB Esquire
Kerry, I appreciate you warning Mr. Brunson. Do you feel his naivete’ is sincere, because what you suggested could be just what the DS has been waiting for.
Fantastic Kerry.
Love you so+++
M
We definitely want to hear from Loy’s brother Darren if possible – Make It Happen Kerry!!!!
Kerry have you ever considered having Tore from Tory Says on????????????????????
This could be HUGE and just the crack we need to start busting this Ginormous Nut wide open let us all co-create the most benevolent outcome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The purpose of the conference is to determine whether the court will take up the case or not. You two danced around this question for some minutes, ending at about 27:00. Whether it’s Friday Dec 2 or Friday Dec 7 (Pearl Harbor), what the Supreme Court is deciding in conference is whether or not to take up the case.
The defense limited the case to immunity by waiving their rights at the point the solicitor general took over the case. The court has already conceded that a national emergency exists (as they allowed rule 11) and therefore, it’s likely that immunity will not be granted.
Still, given all of that, Patriots should be prepared for the Supreme Court to use this case to strike a death blow against all ‘election deniers’ by unilaterally finding that either the 388 defendants do in fact have immunity, that a state of national emergency does not exist in regards to the 2020 election and that no proof of fraud exists.
This case gives them the leeway to find extensively on all three points effectively ending all challenge to the 2020 election.
It’s also possible they could fully strike down the 2020 elections and call for a special election as a remedy.
But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.