UPDATE: 12.08.24
I have confirmation from a high level source this was a nuke. The EQ of 7.0 off Cape Mendocino was a nuke. Having grown up in California, first in Northern California and then from the age around 20 I lived in Southern California (Los Angeles and north of there) since then, I have spent years comparing EQ charts and tracking aftershocks.
This major quake of 7.0 was wrongly reported and misunderstood all around. There are only a very few of us who saw what was really happening… me, Hal Turner (reporter broadcaster), and Mike Adams. The mainstream information was misleading and just plain wrong (see screenshots at bottom of this article for how they got the details wrong).
It seems there is some confusion between what appeared to be two quakes. News outlets don’t agree on the epicenter and which struck first whether the epicenter was near Ferndale or near Petrolia and this IRIS screenshot shows just one large quake and several smaller aftershocks in another location (near Petrolia) in the 4.0 range.
Hal Turner, excellent reporter also saw the anomaly of the so-called EQ but where it hit and where the aftershocks show up are two different places… one is maybe 100 or more miles away from the other. Very strange. Anyway I got confirmation from a high level source ..I was right it was a nuke.
…’From AP:
The quake struck at 10:44 a.m. west of Ferndale, a small city in coastal Humboldt County, about 130 miles (209 km) from the Oregon border, the U.S. Geological Survey said.” AND 30 miles out to sea…. But all the aftershocks are down near Petrolia which is further south and inland. The big quake hit 30 miles off shore…at Cape Mendocino and then north of that. Turns out there is an undersea military base there. See EQ list and pic there was only 1 large “hit” all the rest were smaller around 4.0 around Petrolia.
The bottomline here is it was a nuke aimed at an undersea area that is said to contain a deep maglev train that goes to Moscow. Note: this is unverified info but worth stating. And therefore the nuke hit was done by our guys to close off the West Coast access route undersea….Why is unclear other than looking to the future it may be necessary as the U.S. becomes more vulnerable due to invasionary forces coming for example up through Russia from China?
Another note is the repeated after shocks showing up near Petrolia make no sense other than perhaps an additional EQ weapon aimed at destabilizing the San Andreas fault north of San Francisco. There has been a concentrated deliberate focus on taking down San Francisco for a few years now and the city is hugely destabilized as a result. My future psychic info regarding large quakes says “they” plan to hit San Francisco first and then a few months later hit Los Angeles. My take on who the “they” is in that case is the dark side. Whereas closing this corridor/maglev is a white hat move. Use your own discretion, this is only me putting 2+2 together… Subject to change as more data points come in.
For the full list of Earthquakes before, on and after December 5, 2024 see this link:
https://pnsn.org/earthquakes/recent/
I received the following on December 6th.
EMERGENCY ALERT 🚨🚨
CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE – Thursday 12/5/2024 INTELL DROP – Interesting Wave Forms on Seismic Monitors. This was an off shore NUCLEAR BLAST “not” an Earthquake.
Radiation counts are UP THREE TIMES BEYONG NORMAL. This was an underwater blast. WE WERE NUKED 🤦♀️🏴☠️🚨☠️
***
I posted the following on multiple newsgroups, X.com and my Telegram:
The claim is that the EQ in Northern CA was actually a nuke. If the above is correct, then …As I said, this is a weather war situation. It looks like we may have exchanged nukes with Iran and California was hit. FURTHER VERIFICATION NEEDED. If anyone you know can test for radiation in Humbolt County please let me know. kerry@projectcamelot.tv
The above is a screenshot of all the Earthquakes happening around the world at the same approximate time. As you can see both California (Humbolt County near the Oregon border) was hit off the coast around the same time as a number of EQs hit Iran…this suggests a weather war situation. For what it is worth, the Fukushima nuclear disaster was triggered by an Earthquake. That quake was centered off the coast of Honshu, Japan and was triggered by a nuke hitting undersea off the coast according to multiple whistleblowers. See link below for more on that.
THEN the following came in from a reputable reporter Hal Turner:
Radiation Spike – San Diego, CA People wondering: Was Yesterday’s “Earthquake” actually Underwater Nuke Blast?
…”We need someone to grab some real Radiation readings out there, on the San Diego area Beaches, and email me at: Hal.Turner@HalTurnerRadioShow.com. “
***
And then someone sent me a recent video by MIKE ADAMS…
Mike Adams is suggesting an undersea nuke:
This story is similar to what happened with Fukushima… the quake was miles up north from the nuclear power plant…but the tsunami ended up flooding the plant (among other things) causing the disaster. In this case down by San Diego is a major nuclear power plant San Onofre… IS THE RADIATION SPIKE in San Diego from the nuclear blast/ EQ or from San Onofre flooding?
This pic shows the flow of the currents and why the radiation spike only shows up in San Diego because the current starts 30 miles out to sea up north and then comes closer to the coast when it hits San Diego area.
And this pic (courtesy of Hal Turner’s post) shows the sudden spike indicating not a build up then release like most EQs but a “hit”.
Side issue but worth noting is:
North County Report: What’s the Deal with San Onofre’s Nuclear Power Plant?
DEVELOPING STORY…
RELATED LINKS:
Jim Stone former NSA whistleblower did the best reporting on Fukushima:
https://archive.org/details/fukureport1b
https://www.history.com/news/fukushima-nuclear-disaster-japan-earthquake-timeline
NUCLEAR HIGH ALERTS: On December 5th there were over 60 nuclear alerts sent out….
HOW THE VARIOUS MAINSTREAM NEWS GOT THE DETAILS WRONG: They can’t seem to agree on the main quake and whether the epicenter was near Ferndale, CA (but out to sea 30 miles) or Petrolia. See the distance between these two points:
From Fox:
From CBS:
From AP:
…”The quake struck at 10:44 a.m. west of Ferndale, a small city in coastal Humboldt County, about 130 miles (209 km) from the Oregon border, the U.S. Geological Survey said.”
From MSN:
…”Two major earthquakes struck off California’s coast early Thursday.
According to preliminary data from the United States Geological Survey, the first quake was a magnitude 6.6 with an epicenter about 40 miles west-northwest of Petrolia.
These two news outlets don’t recognize that the quake and aftershocks were located in different areas…
The first 7.0 was a larger quake of magnitude 7.0 with an epicenter about 30 miles west of Ferndale but all the aftershocks (see the above list of all quakes) came from Petrolia.
The US National Tsunami Warning Center issued tsunami warnings along the coast of northern California to southern Oregon, stretching from San Francisco to around Newport.
A number of questions remain. Were the quakes around the same time in Iran a coincidence (see the IRIS world map of quakes above)?
If you look closely at the Earthquake lists (see above) you can clearly see there was only one large “quake” or nuke hitting with a magnitude of 7.0. There were hundreds of aftershocks centered in the Petrolia region (out to sea)… but virtually none in the area around the Ferndale area (out to sea).
This suggests the Petrolia EQs were purposely triggered as a distraction to cover the initial 7.0 out to sea 30 miles from Ferndale. And according to my source there is an undersea military base in that area where an undersea maglev train connects and goes to Moscow and possibly other places?
The nuke was done to shut down that undersea corridor. And not an attack by Iran.
We often hear that there are usually multiple objectives to any given operation. Unclear at this point but worth considering. At this time, the news media have moved on and this story appears to have been silenced.
