April 23, 2011

Over the last day or so I was made aware of the discussion going on, on Benjamin Fulford’s blog found here.I was already a member but had only been reading Ben’s articles not following the discussion below taking place in the comment section under each article. However, I had some time after the DOS attacks yesterday and so I took the opportunity to read and then post a few comments of my own there.

I am reposting here for my readers one of my last comments that took the form of an article I entitled, “How to Make a Revolution”… (special note: I refer to “Caleb” and “OBH” those are user names of a couple people who post to Ben’s blog).

How to Make a Revolution…

Hi all,

Caleb…thanks for posting segments from some of my recent articles here on this blog. However, those articles were written several weeks ago prior to me posting here on this blog. I trust this clarifies my position for OBH and others… I stand on my earlier statements made above…. If necessary I will repost them later.

To clarify:

1. OBH – I meant no disrespect by saying you were an older indigo… that was simply the energy signature I was reading. Some people call themselves indigo and are younger than say 50… however there are also older indigos out there. Some prefer the term Starseeds… At any rate I was simply commenting that you would be one of the older ones in my view. Apparently, by your response, I was correct. That was purely my psychic take on you. Again, nothing wrong with the term older…

2. As I said… we (myself and the White Hats) have had many debates..
And again, my view is that the settlements will never be granted unless those in the position to grant them (did someone say Bush,Sr.?) decide it fits in with their agenda. I can’t imagine you would disagree with that statement. Unfortunately, I believe this is where the agenda of Bush SR et al gets hard to discern… other than we know they want to eliminate 2/3rds of the population among other things.

3. White Hats – I noticed another post of yours OBH refers to the Bush photos with white hats etc. You are missing the point here… A later reference to white hats (in our history) comes from whistleblowers from black projects who wished to refer in some way to the cross agency/org individuals who are working on behalf of humanity while disguised as black hats within that world. The term White Hats is appropriate but does not refer back to any shenanigans of the Bushes with their hats etc. The fact is, using language is problematic enough and historical usage of terms often change.
A similar smear campaign was put out there by some determined disinfo agents wanting to take down Project Camelot… By attempting to make it appear as though our Project Camelot was the same as the older usage of this name by some nefarious government agency with a dark agenda. And yet originally Camelot comes from of course, the Arthurian legend… and this is what our choice of the name for our “project” was inspired by. I happened to be aware that black projects often preceded CODE NAMES of secret projects with the word “project” and I had also just written a screenplay that I called “PROJECT MOONDUST” … so while Bill and I were meeting in Tintagel, one of the said homes of King Arthur we wanted to use the name CAMELOT because of the roundtable where all were equal because we intended to battle the hierarchy in society ultimately through revealing truth, by filming testimony from those from black projects…. so PROJECT CAMELOT seemed like the perfect name. Besides, we knew getting a website named Camelot by itself would never fly since there would be no urls available…. So that’s how the name came about. You can I hope see how use of language, and especially naming things, is easily confusing and misleading.

Finally, the fact that the White Hats are working to achieve the Global Settlements will not solve our problems… their agenda in focusing on this is very short term… It does not address what to do with the Federal Reserve. From what I understand they plan to reveal where all the bodies are buried, so to speak, eventually. However, stabilizing the dollar is only a first step, from their pov.

I think one can attack this problem of saving the world for humanity in a number of ways… some short term gestures may be helpful or maybe not.

It’s like when you look at how to create a revolution in the masses… even radicals will tell you it may actually be better to have a repressive regime in order to stimulate real unrest in the population, than to have some middle of the road regime. Because the more moderate approach is less likely to stimulate a rebellion and therefore doesn’t actually suit the ultimate purpose of the radical and yet, it seems a contradiction because in reality, the middle of the road regime does have some elements in it that would seem to reflect what the so-called radical or revolutionary really is seeking to put in place.
In this case, with the White Hats, we have the reverse of the above. What I mean is, they are attempting small steps, if you will, rather than the grander sweeping gestures that Benjamin is suggesting. And while I don’t agree with the ’small step’ approach –being a radical at heart, I do understand their ultimate agenda. Which is, if they are being truthful, to save the union… that is, the U.S. as a viable state. Just because one is a patriot and believes their country should remain an intact entity does not automatically mean they want it to continue along the way it has been going.

What they seem to want is to rescue the immediate situation… and then set about putting the house in order.
To that end, what I see is us wanting the same things… peace, prosperity for all and a glorious future for the planet. How we go about getting there is the question on the table.

Best wishes to all,
Project Camelot
and yes, this is the real Kerry Cassidy

originally posted to the comment section of Benjamin Fulford’s blog at benjaminfulford.net

Benjamin Fulford’s Blog


1 × one =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>