December 11, 2010 Updated
Leaks Can Lie
This is a cautionary note. Just because you see a leaked cable this does not mean the information in there is all true! Please understand you must cross reference and do your homework. Some cables and leaked information is purposely leaked. This much we know. The question you have to ask yourself is whether any given piece of information is true or not. The major question to focus the mind: “cui bono?” Who benefits?
Wikileaks included. Don’t disconnect your brain from the process at hand. We know this. I encourage everyone who supports freedom of speech to support Wikileaks and Julian’s release from prison. But this is a hall of mirrors and the PTB love playing cat and mouse with your consciousness. Be discerning. Connect the dots. Examine the evidence and keep an open mind.
Spiral in Norway – Project Bluebeam – Haarp
Disclose.tv – Top Secret Cable Reveal Norway Spiral Was HAARP Video
Thanks to Camelot supporter for sending the link.
Sign PETITION TO PROTEST crackdown on Wikileaks and free speech.
Jesse Ventura : Conspiracy Theory – BP the stock plot behind the spill
This is worth watching. Cudos to Jesse, Leonard Horowitz and Sherri Kane.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWVQvVSeRdA
Full Episode.
FOUND links to released Wikileaks
All WIKILEAKS cables are here:
http://91.192.100.156/cablegate.html
Cheers.
Above Black Leaks
Please be aware that we are working on setting up an area of our website that allows for anonymous submissions of above top secret and above black documents, leaks and information. As soon as possible we will have this up and running…. ‘the best defense is a good offense’.
“Here then is the truth about the Truth; the Truth is not bridge, sturdy to every step, a marvel of bound planks and supports from the known into the unknown, but a surging sea of smashed wood, flotsam and drowning sailors.” –Julian Assange, 2007 from his personal site: IQ.org, Selected Correspondence
We are Anonymous
QUOTE FROM DANIEL ELLSBERG: “Julian Assange is not a criminal under the laws of the United States. I was the first one prosecuted for the charges that would be brought against him. I was the first person ever prosecuted for a leak in this country—although there had been a lot of leaks before me. That’s because the First Amendment kept us from having an Official Secrets Act. . . . The founding of this country was based on the principle that the government should not have a say as to what we hear, what we think, and what we read. . . .
If Bradley Manning did what he’s accused of, then he’s a hero if mine and I think he did a great service to this country. We’re not in the mess we’re in, in the world, because of too many leaks. . . . I say there should be some secrets. But I also say we invaded Iraq illegally because of a lackof a Bradley Manning at that time.” – Daniel Elllsberg http://www.ellsberg.net/
False Witness – the case against Assange
A good article on the background to the charges against Assange:
http://radsoft.net/news/20101001,01.shtml
Julian Assange : A radical of the highest order
The following was sent to me by Bill Ryan… some excellent research. This is background most people have not investigated. What this indicates and in my view, is clear when you listen carefully to the way Julian Assange replies to questions, is that he has had years of self-education in seeing beneath at least the top layer of the facade of society and govenrments (institutions).
Two gems (from many on his old site)
Wed 12 Jul 2006 : The cream of Australian Physics
http://web.archive.org/web/20071020051936/http://iq.org/#ThecreamofAustralianPhysics
[“There are no unarguable axioms of value or worth, there are only
inclinations and my inclinations have turned to an intense loathing
of institutions, and most of the people in them; those spineless
supplicants agape at the passing of other men’s ideas, not drawn by
desire, but driven by fear and ignorance, to the tepid hearth of
institutionalism. One may argue as to the qualities of a passing man’s
wife, but as a life philosophy it can only appeal to self-loathing
celibates. How much better the subjective stance which curls the mind
around the lovely creature in one’s embrace!
This perception etched into me when I attended an Australian
Institute of Physics conference at ANU with 900 career physicists,
the body of which were snivelling fearful conformists of woefully,
woefully inferior character. For every Feynman or Lorentz, 100 pen
pushing wretches scratching each others eyes out in academic
committees or building better bombs for the DSTO (Defence Science &
Technology Organisation), who had provided everyone with a bag,
embossed with their logo, which most physicists pathetically lugged
about with pride and ignorance.
A year before, also at ANU, I represented my university at the
Australian National Physics Competition. At the prize ceremony, the
head of ANU physics, motioned to us and said, ‘You are the cream of
Australian physics’. I looked around, and thought, ‘Christ Almighty,
I hope he’s wrong’.
Thu 08 Jun 2006 : The history of warfare
http://web.archive.org/web/20071020051936/http://iq.org/#Thehistoryofwarfare
The history of warfare is similarly subdivided, although here the phases
are Retribution, Anticipation, and Diplomacy. Thus:
* Retribution: I’m going to kill you because you killed my brother.
* Anticipation: I’m going to kill you because I killed your brother.
* Diplomacy: I’m going to kill my brother and then kill you on the pretext that your brother did it.”]
********
“Anyone who thinks that Assange is an intel asset, maybe better think again. Webster Tarpley and other critics have clearly not done their research. He’s a radical intellect of the highest order.”–Bill Ryan
